2011年1月25日 星期二

To this litany of self-surveillance exploiters

To this litany of self-surveillance exploiters


To this litany of self-surveillance exploiters we can now add health insurers, who are using social media to uncover evidence of insurance fraud -- evidence published by the fraudsters themselves. For example, The Los Angeles Times quotes Frank Scafidi, spokesman for the National Insurance Crime Bureau: "They look out for things that don't add up, like someone who claimed they hurt their back too badly to work and then bragged on Facebook about running a marathon." In fact the social media gambit is so widespread now that it is becoming standard; the LAT also cites Peter Foley, vice president of claims administration at American Insurance Assn., who says fraud investigators might be judged negligent if they don't take at least a cursory glance at social media "to check for contradictions."

There's no question insurance fraud is a huge problem, costing the U.S. as much as $80 billion per year, according to the LAT,You would like cctv security camera watches. and fraud raises insurance premiums for law-abiding folk, so the public should broadly be in favor of anti-fraud measures.Huge selection of gaga-deals for your garde,

v But there is obviously a danger of fraud-hunters making mistakes, abusing their new technique for sniffing out ill-doing, or simply pushing their surveillance too far. For example,outdoor christmas decorations from PrestigeTime at discounted prices. investigators might use evidence from social media to deny someone health insurance,Choose from a huge range of Bvlgari. or raise their rates because of previously undisclosed conditions, according to a report from insurance consulting firm Celent titled "Leveraging Social Networks: An In-Depth View for Insurers."

While investigators claim they never make a judgment based on social media alone, some types of information cited by the LAT should be oThe Hampton Bay 2-Light Flush-Mount cctv surveillance camera features a round design and a brushed-nickel finish.ff limits no matter what: in one example, health insurers might raise the rate for someone who "Likes" a cancer support group, but this evidence is ambiguous at best (they might just "Like" it because it helped their best friend).

沒有留言:

張貼留言