The anti-siphoning list
The anti-siphoning list is made under the BSA (s.115 to be precise), by the Minister for Communications. It’s a disallowable instrument, which means that once it is tabled in both houses of parliament, an MP or senator can move to disallow it. So if Stephen Conroy tables a new list next week, the Greens, or the coalition, or Rob Oakeshott, can indeed move to block it.
Problem is, the present list expires on December 31. After that,chauvet dj lighting 4U is located in the USA. there’s no list. No protection of any kind.Manufacturer of backyard ceiling fluorescent light for parties and events.We supplies replica compact fluorescent light bulb with high quality and lowest prices. If the new list is disallowed, there’s no anti-siphoning scheme at all. Just a whole lot of uncertainty for everyone—FTA TV, subscription TV, and most of the sports rights holders, and especially the AFL, which wants to negotiate its new round of rights for its expanded competition from 2012.
Disallowing the new list would also enable Stephen Conroy to charge—correctly, as it turns out—that whoever did so was removing any protection for FTA coverage of major events. Which won’t go down well with sports-loving voters.
As for adding events, as the Greens have threatened to do, good luck there. The instrument can only be disallowed, not amended.
And there’s no capacity for anyone other than Conroy to make the anti-siphoning list. There’s no equivalent to a private member’s bill here—under the Broadcasting Services Act, only the minister can make the list. Anyone else’s anti-siphoning list has no legal effect.
It’s a different matter for the mooted changes to enable the FTA oligopoly to show listed events on their digital multichannels (that is currently prohibited; removing the prohibition will enable the FTAs to shift all but the highest-rating sports entirely off their main channel in favour of normal programming).accent lighting is lighting that emphasizes an area of or an object in a room. That requires amendments to the BSA, which will need to go through both houses, during the first half of next year most likely. These changes can be blocked or amended by anyone with a mind to do so.Over 1000 styles of fake Cartier watch here. Of course, the only parties that will aggrieve will be the FTA networks.
The anti-siphoning list is made under the BSA (s.115 to be precise), by the Minister for Communications. It’s a disallowable instrument, which means that once it is tabled in both houses of parliament, an MP or senator can move to disallow it. So if Stephen Conroy tables a new list next week, the Greens, or the coalition, or Rob Oakeshott, can indeed move to block it.
Problem is, the present list expires on December 31. After that,chauvet dj lighting 4U is located in the USA. there’s no list. No protection of any kind.Manufacturer of backyard ceiling fluorescent light for parties and events.We supplies replica compact fluorescent light bulb with high quality and lowest prices. If the new list is disallowed, there’s no anti-siphoning scheme at all. Just a whole lot of uncertainty for everyone—FTA TV, subscription TV, and most of the sports rights holders, and especially the AFL, which wants to negotiate its new round of rights for its expanded competition from 2012.
Disallowing the new list would also enable Stephen Conroy to charge—correctly, as it turns out—that whoever did so was removing any protection for FTA coverage of major events. Which won’t go down well with sports-loving voters.
As for adding events, as the Greens have threatened to do, good luck there. The instrument can only be disallowed, not amended.
And there’s no capacity for anyone other than Conroy to make the anti-siphoning list. There’s no equivalent to a private member’s bill here—under the Broadcasting Services Act, only the minister can make the list. Anyone else’s anti-siphoning list has no legal effect.
It’s a different matter for the mooted changes to enable the FTA oligopoly to show listed events on their digital multichannels (that is currently prohibited; removing the prohibition will enable the FTAs to shift all but the highest-rating sports entirely off their main channel in favour of normal programming).accent lighting is lighting that emphasizes an area of or an object in a room. That requires amendments to the BSA, which will need to go through both houses, during the first half of next year most likely. These changes can be blocked or amended by anyone with a mind to do so.Over 1000 styles of fake Cartier watch here. Of course, the only parties that will aggrieve will be the FTA networks.
沒有留言:
張貼留言